Last Visit: 01 July 2005
Posted on 30 November 2007 at 01:03:06 Ok, first off i think this game is pretty cool. But then i read this by paul sage:
Now there was obviously a bug..even i could see that it is doing more damage than it is listed. but if all he was concerned with is the extra damage wouldnt he just make the adjustment to bring the actual damage down to the listed damage in the tooltip?
The old rage was supposed to be 100% at rank 5 if memory serves correct and was a grp buff : now its going to be cut down to 50% : fixing the bug that says the actual damage is more than the tooltip damage does not include lowering the tooltip damage, which was the intended damage.this is a nerf pure and simple.
i have absolutely no problem with the changes to rage. Its their game and they have the right to make the changes they see fit. the 50% is still very nice and it will have resistances to boot, but why does paul feel the need to lie? dont say "we are not nerfing, we are fixing a bug" when its obviosly not just fixing a bug. the bug was extra un-intended damage right? so just lower the damage to the tooltip listing, or admit that you are nerfing the ability, honesty is better than hearing half-truths.